U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Efrain Flores

United States v. Efrain Flores
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 16, 2013 · Schroeder, Graber, Paez
538 F. App'x 773

Counsel

Aine Ahmed, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Matthew Campbell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

United States v. Efrain Flores

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Efrain Flores appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 63-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of “actual” (pure) methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Flores contends that the district court erred in denying him a minor role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). We review for clear error. See United States v. Cantrell, 433 F.3d 1269, 1282 (9th Cir. 2006). Because Flores failed to prove that he was substantially less culpable than the average participant in the offense, the district court did not clearly err by denying the adjustment. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n. 3(A); Cantrell, 433 F.3d at 1282-83.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.