U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Eleazar Ramirez-Vasquez

United States v. Eleazar Ramirez-Vasquez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 19, 2013 · Schroeder, Graber, Paez
538 F. App'x 788

United States v. Eleazar Ramirez-Vasquez

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Eleazar Ramirez-Vasquez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 27-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ramirez-Vasquez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Ramirez-Vasquez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.