United States v. Edna Arochi
United States v. Edna Arochi
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 19 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-10296 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:11-cr-02885-CKJ v. MEMORANDUM * EDNA AROCHI, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted August 14, 2013 ** Before: SCHROEDER, GRABER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Edna Arochi appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges her guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence for attempted exportation of firearms and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 554. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Arochi’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Arochi the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 12-10296
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.