United States v. Ismael Robles-Perez
United States v. Ismael Robles-Perez
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Ismael Robles-Perez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 48-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Robles-Perez contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of his psychological condition. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Robles-Perez’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The 48-month sentence, well below the uncontested Guidelines range of 77 to 96 months, is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Robles-Lopez’s extensive criminal history and five prior deportations. See id.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.