MEMORANDUM **

Ines Adalid Fonseca Logos, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings to pursue cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion *757 to reopen, and review de novo questions of law. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Fonseca Logos’s motion to reopen to pursue cancellation of removal where he failed to establish prejudice arising from the alleged ineffective assistance by his former counsel. See id. at 793-94.

Fonseca Logos’s contention that the BIA applied the wrong standard fails. See Ray v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 582, 587 (9th Cir. 2006).

We also reject Fonseca Logo’s arguments that the BIA failed to adequately consider, weigh, and address the evidence he submitted. See Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 2010).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.