U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Harry Redds, Jr.

United States v. Harry Redds, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 3, 2013 · Rawlinson, Smith, Christen
540 F. App'x 791

United States v. Harry Redds, Jr.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Harry Lee Redds, Jr., appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking supervised release and the sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Redds’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Redds the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

A review of the record indicates that this appeal is moot because Redds’s supervised release has again been revoked. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998). We accordingly dismiss the appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.