U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Margarito Flores-Cordero

United States v. Margarito Flores-Cordero
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 4, 2013

United States v. Margarito Flores-Cordero

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-10220 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:11-cr-02432-CKJ- GEE-1 MARGARITO FLORES- CORDERO, ORDER AMENDING Defendant-Appellant. OPINION

Filed October 4, 2013 Before: Mary M. Schroeder and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges, and Sarah S. Vance, Chief District Judge.*

ORDER The Opinion filed July 25, 2013, appearing at 723 F.3d 1085, is amended as follows: 1. At slip op. 4, in the first sentence of the second full paragraph; 723 F.3d at 1086, line of the third full paragraph, insert “or risk” between the words “application” and “of.”

* The Honorable Sarah S. Vance, Chief United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.

2 UNITED STATES V. FLORES-CORDERO 2. At slip op. 8, in the first sentence of the second full paragraph; 723 F.3d at 1088, line of the second full paragraph, delete the word “serious.”

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing.

The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.