FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 22 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-10591 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:07-cr-01516-RCC v. MEMORANDUM * RAMIRO LOPEZ-DIAZ, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding Submitted October 15, 2013 ** Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Ramiro Lopez-Diaz appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the revocation of supervised release and the 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Lopez-Diaz’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Lopez-Diaz the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 12-10591