MEMORANDUM **

Hector Alberto Beyris appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 21-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Beyris contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because the circumstances of his case do not justify a 32% variance above the advisory Guidelines range. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Beyris’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Beyris’s willingness to reoffend despite his eight prior removals and two prior sentences for felony immigration offenses. See id.

AFFIRMED.