U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Florence White Eagle

United States v. Florence White Eagle
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided November 12, 2013

United States v. Florence White Eagle

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-30352 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:11-cr-00032- SEH-1 FLORENCE A. WHITE EAGLE, Defendant-Appellant. ORDER

Filed November 12, 2013 Before: Kenneth F. Ripple*, M. Margaret McKeown, and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges.

ORDER The opinion filed July 5, 2013, 721 F.3d 1108, is amended as follows: At page 15 of the slip opinion, line 1; 721 F.3d 1108, 1116, “on or around” shall be changed to “on or about”.

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has * The Honorable Kenneth F. Ripple, Senior Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.

2 UNITED STATES V. WHITE EAGLE requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc.

Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for en banc or panel rehearing shall be permitted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.