United States v. Carlos Bartolon-Lopez
United States v. Carlos Bartolon-Lopez
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 04 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 12-10449 12-10450 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:11-cr-50292-DCB v. 4:11-cr-03821-DCB
CARLOS BARTOLON-LOPEZ, a.k.a. MEMORANDUM* Anthony Felix-Lopez,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 19, 2013**
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Carlos Bartolon-Lopez appeals his guilty-plea
conviction and 77-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Bartolon-Lopez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no
grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
provided Bartolon-Lopez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No
pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 12-10449 & 12-10450
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished