Marlene June v. United States
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States v. Kwai Fun Wong (Supreme Court of the United States 2015)
- United States v. Kwai Fun Wong (Supreme Court of the United States 2015)
- Anthony Booth v. United States (9th Cir. 2019)
- United States v. Kwai Fun Wong. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 2015)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
*506 MEMORANDUM ***
Plaintiff Marlene June, acting as conservator for A.K.B., (“June”) appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of the United States. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and reverse and remand. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of the case, we will not recount it here.
After the district court entered judgment, an en banc panel of this Court held that 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b) of the Federal Tort Claims Act is not jurisdictional and that equitable adjustment of the limitations period in that section is not prohibited. Wong v. Beebe, 732 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2013) (en banc), overruling Marley v. United States, 567 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2009). In light of Wong, we must reverse the district court’s contrary ruling and remand for further proceedings consistent with this disposition.
We need not, and do not, reach any other issue urged by the parties on appeal.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.