U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Jaime Juarez

United States v. Jaime Juarez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 2, 2013 · Goodwin, Wallace, Fisher
507 F. App'x 671

United States v. Jaime Juarez

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jaime Juarez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his jury-trial conviction and 84-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 892.60 kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(vii); and 846; and possession *672 with intent to distribute 892.60 kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(B)(vii). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Juarez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Juarez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.