United States v. Luis Sagrero-Alba
United States v. Luis Sagrero-Alba
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 30 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10544
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00466-PMP v.
MEMORANDUM* LUIS MIGUEL SAGRERO-ALBA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 17, 2013** Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Luis Miguel Sagrero-Alba appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 151-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A)(viii), and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (1967), Sagrero-Alba’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Sagrero-Alba the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 11-10544
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished