U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2013

Rafael Gonzalez v. City of Anaheim

Rafael Gonzalez v. City of Anaheim
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 28, 2013 · Kozinski, Watford
733 F.3d 979; 2013 WL 5779632; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 21950 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Gary Steven Bennett, Esquire, Law Offices Of Gary S. Bennett, Laguna Hills, CA, for Plaintiff., Dale Kristopher Galipo, Esquire, Melanie Tara Partow, Law Offices of Dale K. Galipo, Woodland Hills, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants., Moses Wilbur Johnson, Esquire, Anaheim City Attorney’s Office, Anaheim, CA, for Defendants-Appellees., D.C. No. 2:10-cv-04660-PA-SH.

Rafael Gonzalez v. City of Anaheim

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel *980 opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge WATFORD did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.