United States v. Librado Alvarez-Bajo

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Librado Alvarez-Bajo

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 21 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10143

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:07-CR-01525-JMR

v. MEMORANDUM * LIBRADO ALVAREZ-BAJO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Marvin E. Aspen, District Judge, Presiding **

Submitted February 11, 2013 ***

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Librado Alvarez-Bajo appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 78-month sentence for illegal reentry

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Marvin E. Aspen, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Alvarez-Bajo’s counsel has filed a brief stating

that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record. We have provided Alvarez-Bajo the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 09-10143

Reference

Status
Unpublished