Benito Acosta v. City of Costa Mesa
Benito Acosta v. City of Costa Mesa
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BENITO ACOSTA , No. 10-56854 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 8:06-cv-00233- DOC-MLG CITY OF COSTA MESA ; ALLAN Central District MANSOOR, Mayor of the City of of California, Costa Mesa, in his official and Santa Ana individual capacities, Defendants-Appellees, ORDER JOHN HENSLEY , Chief of Police, Costa Mesa Police Department; DAVID ANDERSEN ; DAVID DEHUFF; JOHN DOEZIE ; BRYAN GLASS; DANIEL GUTH ; DAVID MAKIYAMA ; JEFF TOBIN ; DEREK TRUSK, in their official and individual capacities, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted July 9, 2012—Pasadena, California 2 ACOSTA V . CITY OF COSTA MESA Filed February 25, 2013 Before: Richard C. Tallman and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and Dee V. Benson, District Judge.*
COUNSEL Belinda E. Helzer, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Orange, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
M. Lois Boback (argued) and Daniel K. Spradlin, Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart, APC, Costa Mesa, California, for Defendants-Appellees.
ORDER The petition for panel rehearing is granted and the opinion filed September 5, 2012, and appearing at 694 F.3d 960 (9th Cir. 2012), is withdrawn. Carver v. Lehman, 558 F.3d 869, 878–79 (9th Cir. 2008) (a panel may withdraw an opinion sua sponte before the mandate issues). It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit. Withdrawal of the opinion moots the petition for rehearing en banc.
* The Honorable Dee V. Benson, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, sitting by designation.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.