U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Ramirez-Reynosa

United States v. Ramirez-Reynosa
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 22, 2013 · Fletcher, Pregerson, Reinhardt
513 F. App'x 687

United States v. Ramirez-Reynosa

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Francisco Ramirez-Reynosa appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ramirez-Reynosa’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Ramirez-Reynosa the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.