U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2013

Hernandez v. Indymac Bank

Hernandez v. Indymac Bank
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 9, 2013
532 F. App'x 763

Hernandez v. Indymac Bank

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiff Jose Hernandez appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendants. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Resources De*764fense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 24, 129 S.Ct. 365, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l., 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.