United States v. Reese
United States v. Reese
539 F. App'x 752
United States v. Reese
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Reese admits he didn’t see the allegedly defective notice before trial, and doesn’t allege he would have accepted a plea agreement but for the erroneous sentencing information. He therefore hasn’t demonstrated that the alleged error “affected substantial rights.” United States v. Gonzalez-Aparicio, 663 F.3d 419, 428 (9th Cir. 2011).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.