U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2013

Corber v. Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 24, 2013 · Gould, Lemelle, Rawlinson

540 F. App'x 650

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

We conclude that Plaintiffs petition for coordination was not a proposal to try the cases jointly. See Judith Romo, et al. v. Teva Pharmaceutical USA, Inc., No. 13-80036 (9th Cir. Sept. 24, 2013). We AFFIRM the district court’s order granting Plaintiffs’ motion to remand.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Dissenting Opinion

Gould, Circuit Judge,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent for the same reasons expressed in the dissent to the majority opinion in Romo v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, No. 13-56310.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.