U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Victor Bojorquez-Alvarez

United States v. Victor Bojorquez-Alvarez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 22, 2013

United States v. Victor Bojorquez-Alvarez

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 22 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-10378 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00294-LDG v. MEMORANDUM * VICTOR MANUEL BOJORQUEZ- ALVAREZ, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 16, 2013 ** Before: CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Victor Manuel Bojorquez-Alvarez appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Bojorquez-Alvarez contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of the fact that, at the time of sentencing, he had already served an 18- month sentence for the immigration offense that triggered his revocation. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Bojorquez-Alvarez’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The 12-month sentence is substantively reasonable in light of Bojorquez-Alvarez’s failure to be deterred and breach of the court’s trust. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e); United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir. 2007).

AFFIRMED.

2 12-10378

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.