U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Rufino Valdes-Vega

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 25, 2013 · Kozinski

714 F.3d 1134; 2013 WL 1760865; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 8395 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Daniel Ackerman, Assistant U.S., Curtis A. Kin, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Mark Remy Yohalem, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Gretchen Fusilier, Carlsbad, CA, for Defendant-Appellant., D.C. No. 5:09-cr-00024-VAP-l.

Opinion

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.