MEMORANDUM **

Jerry Herold Middle Rider appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his jury-trial conviction for assault resulting in serious bodily injury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153(a) and 113(a)(6). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Middle Rider contends that the district court erroneously admitted the testimony of a battered women’s shelter volunteer regarding statements the victim made to her when the victim arrived at the shelter because it was hearsay. We review the district court’s evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion, and, if hearsay testimony was erroneously admitted, we review whether the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Payne, 944 F.2d 1458, 1472 (9th Cir. 1991). The record reflects that the challenged testimony was not hearsay; it was properly admitted to show its effect on the listener, rather than the truth of the matter asserted. See id. Moreover, any error in admitting the testimony was harmless in light of other evidence presented at trial. See id. at 1473.

AFFIRMED.