U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Francisco Gomez-Vasquez

United States v. Francisco Gomez-Vasquez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 21, 2013 · Tallman, Smith, Hurwitz
530 F. App'x 642

United States v. Francisco Gomez-Vasquez

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Francisco Gomez-Vasquez appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking supervised release and the 18-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gomez- *643 Vasquez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Gomez-Vasquez has filed a pro se supplemental brief. The government has filed a motion for summary affirmance.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. The government’s motion for summary affirmance is denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.