U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Luis Rodriguez

United States v. Luis Rodriguez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 24, 2013 · Tallman, Smith, Hurwitz
531 F. App'x 798

United States v. Luis Rodriguez

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Luis Rodriguez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his jury-trial conviction and 70-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(vii). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Rodriguez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Rodriguez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and her requests for a ruling are DENIED as moot.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.