MEMORANDUM **

This Court accepts the government’s concession that, in the interests of justice, Morgan’s sentence should be vacated, see United States v. Jones, 696 F.3d 932, 937-38 (9th Cir. 2012) (discussing resolving a possible conflict between a sentence orally pronounced and the sentence contained in a subsequent written judgment), and that this case should be remanded for resentencing on an open record, see United States v. Matthews, 278 F.3d 880, 885 (9th Cir. 2002) (en banc). At oral argument Morgan did not object to this suggested resolution of his appeal.

Vacated and Remanded.

IT IS SO ORDERED.