MEMORANDUM ***

Defendant-Appellant David Francisco Lazo-Romero appeals his conviction of illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We affirm. Even if the delay in Lazo- *635 Romero’s presentment to the magistrate was unreasonable or unnecessary under the circumstances of the case, see Corley v. United States, 556 U.S. 303, 129 S.Ct. 1558, 173 L.Ed.2d 443 (2009); United States v. Garcia-Hernandez, 569 F.3d 1100 (9th Cir. 2009), any error was harmless. It is less probable than not that such error materially affected the verdict. United States v. Seschillie, 310 F.3d 1208, 1214 (9th Cir. 2002).

Even without Lazo-Romero’s post-Mi randa, pre-arraignment confession, an abundance of evidence supported the verdict that Lazo-Romero knowingly and illegally re-entered the United States. Border Patrol agents discovered Lazo-Romero three miles north of the border, in a desolate area in rough terrain, at night, carrying a backpack, and moving north. He attempted to avoid detection by hiding in brush. Immediately after being discovered, he admitted to being a national of El Salvador without permission to enter or remain legally in the United States. He had a lengthy immigration history, which included previous deportation. The government has met its burden to show a “fair assurance of harmlessness,” and that any error was harmless. Seschillie, 310 F.3d at 1214 (internal quotation marks omitted).

AFFIRMED.