Gregory Steshenko v. Thomas McKay

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Gregory Steshenko v. Thomas McKay

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 17 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GREGORY STESHENKO, No. 13-17095

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 5:09-cv-05543-RS v.

MEMORANDUM* THOMAS MCKAY, of the Cabrillo Community College; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Richard Seeborg, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 13, 2014** Before: TROTT, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Gregory Steshenko appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

The sole issue is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).

AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished