MEMORANDUM ***

Carlos Naranjo-Yanez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and sentence of 13 months and one day for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Naranjo-Yanez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Nar-anjo-Yanez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Naranjo-Yanez has waived his right to appeal his conviction. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). Naranjo-Yanez’s appeal is moot with respect to his sentence because he has completed his custodial sentence and is not subject to a term of *579 supervised release. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999). We accordingly dismiss the appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.