U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2014

Maria Navarro-Figueroa v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Maria Navarro-Figueroa v. Eric Holder, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 19, 2014 · Schroeder, Clifton, Cogan
555 F. App'x 694

Maria Navarro-Figueroa v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Maria Navarro-Figueroa petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) finding her removable for having assisted an undocumented alien in entering the United States. See 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(l)(E)(i). We deny the petition.

*695 Navarro-Figueroa contends that the BIA erred in relying on three 1-213 forms and a G-166 report of investigation because those documents contained statements obtained in violation of 8 C.F.R. § 287.3(c). Section 287.3(c) provides that an alien who has been “arrested without warrant and placed in formal proceedings” must be informed that she has a right to counsel and that statements she makes may be used against her. Formal proceedings commence with the filing of a notice to appear in the immigration court. Samayoa-Martinez v. Holder, 558 F.3d 897, 901-02 (9th Cir. 2009). Because Officer Rivera questioned Navarro-Figueroa before a notice to appear was filed in the immigration court, Navarro-Figueroa was not entitled to be informed of her rights.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Navarro-Figueroa affirmatively assisted Beatrice Perez-Cej a in entering the United States in violation of law. The immigration forms and the testimony of Officer Rivera indicated that Navarro-Figueroa met with Perez-Ceja in Tijuana and agreed to drive Perez-Ceja to Los Angeles after she crossed the border, knowing that Perez-Ceja lacked permission to enter the United States legally.

Petition DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.