U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Lucio Ramirez-Mata

United States v. Lucio Ramirez-Mata
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 11, 2014 · Tashima, Graber, Ikuta
568 F. App'x 503

United States v. Lucio Ramirez-Mata

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Lucio Ramirez-Mata appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 24-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 *504 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ramirez-Mata’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Ramirez-Mata the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.