Tashina Fish v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Tashina Fish v. Carolyn W. Colvin
570 F. App'x 680
Tashina Fish v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Reviewing the decision of the district court de novo, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the administrative law judge’s denial of disability benefits. See Hill v. Astrue, 698 F.3d 1153, 1158 (9th Cir. 2012). Although Tashina Fish suffered from a severe cognitive impairment, her back problems were not a severe physical impairment. Therefore, she retained the capacity to perform unskilled work with certain limitations.
AFFIRMED.
**
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.