MEMORANDUM **

Henry Armando Lopez-Duvon appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking supervised release and challenges the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Lopez-Duvon contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to consider his mitigating arguments and to explain the sentence adequately in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. We review for plain error, see United *762 States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 & n. 3 (9th Cir. 2010), and find none. The record reflects that the district court addressed Lopez-Duvon’s mitigating arguments and explained adequately the need for the consecutive, 24-month sentence in light of Lopez-Duvon’s criminal and immigration history and his failure to be deterred by his prior sentences. Its failure to do more was not plain error. See id. at 1108.

AFFIRMED.