U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Douglas Gibson

United States v. Douglas Gibson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 27, 2014 · Clifton, Bea, Watford
575 F. App'x 785

United States v. Douglas Gibson

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Douglas Lane Gibson appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the eight-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gibson’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Gibson the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.