U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2014

Adriana Nunez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Adriana Nunez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 27, 2014 · Clifton, Bea, Watford
575 F. App'x 772

Adriana Nunez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Adriana Nunez and Fabian Nunez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ second motion to reopen as untimely and number-barred because the motion was filed thirteen years after the agency’s final deportation order, and petitioners failed to demonstrate that conditions or circumstances for persons with disabilities have worsened in Mexico since their deportation hearing to qualify for the regulatory exception to the limits for filing motions to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), (3); Toufighi, 538 F.3d at 996.

Petitioners’ remaining contentions are unavailing.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.