MEMORANDUM **

Victor Jose Quintana, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Quintana failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Espinosa was deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) (a prison official is deliberately indifferent only if he or she “knows of and disregards an excessive risk to inmate health or safety!’); Toguchi, 391 F.3d at 1060 (“Deliberate indifference is a high legal standard. A showing of ... negligence is insufficient to establish a constitutional deprivation under the Eighth Amendment.”).

AFFIRMED.