U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2014

Claudia Torres v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Claudia Torres v. Eric Holder, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 16, 2014 · McKeown, Wardlaw, Smith
578 F. App'x 732

Counsel

Adán De Jesus Munoz-Henriquez, Richmond, CA, pro se., OIL, Yanal H. Yousef, Trial, Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr., Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Claudia Torres v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Adán de Jesus Munoz-Henriquez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his- application for withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for review and remand.

In denying Munoz-Henriquez’s withholding of removal claim, the BIA found Munoz-Henriquez failed to articulate a cognizable particular social group. When the IJ and BIA issued their decisions in this case they did not have the benefit of either this court’s decisions in Henriquez-Rivas v. Holder, 707 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2013) (en banc), and Cordoba v. Holder, 726 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2013), or the BIA’s decisions in Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 227 (BIA 2014), and Matter of W-G-R-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 208 (BIA 2014). In light of these intervening decisions, we grant Munoz-Henriquez’s petition for review and remand for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.