Ronald Gunn v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Ronald Gunn v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Opinion
MEMORANDUM *
Ronald G. Gunn appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision denying his application for Supplemental Security Income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Because Gunn did not argue any discernable issues in his opening brief, we affirm the district court. See Nevada Dept. of Corrections v. Greene, 648 F.3d 1014, 1020 (9th Cir. 2011) (pro se appellant’s issues were deemed waived by his failure to support any of the issues with argument); Independent Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (this court reviews only issues argued specifically in a party’s opening brief).
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.