U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2014

Joseph R. Wood v. Ryan

Joseph R. Wood v. Ryan
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 18, 2014 · Thomas, Gould, Bybee
760 F.3d 918; 2014 WL 3610502 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Joseph R. Wood v. Ryan

Opinion

ORDER

Petitioner filed a Consolidated Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Stay of Execution before the Honorable Kim W. Wardlaw. Circuit Judge Wardlaw referred the Petition and Motion to this panel pursuant to Cir. R. 22-2(c) (“Once a case is assigned to a death penalty panel, the panel will handle all matters pertaining to the case_”) and Cir. R. 22-4(e) (“In all capital cases where petitioner seeks a stay of execution, the Clerk shall refer any motion for a stay of execution to the death penalty panel.”).

Under Fed. R.App. P. 22(a), “[a]n application for a writ of habeas corpus must be made to the appropriate district court.” See also Felker v. Turpin, 518 U.S. 651, 660-61, 116 S.Ct. 2833, 135 L.Ed.2d 827 (1996) (noting that the Rule would “bar consideration of original habeas petitions in the courts of appeal”). Pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 22(a), if a habeas petition is filed in the Court of Appeals, “the application must be transferred to the appropriate district court.”

Therefore, the Consolidated Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for a Stay of Execution is transferred to the District of Arizona.

TRANSFERRED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.