MEMORANDUM **

Lee Ann Ferravanti-Edlin appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges a special condition of supervised release imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for distribution of methamphetamine and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(viü)', and 18 U.S.C. § 2(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Ferravanti-Edlin contends that the district court proeedurally erred at sentencing by failing to explain adequately the condition of supervised release requiring that she perform 20 hours of community service per week when not employed or excused by the Probation Officer for schooling, training, or other acceptable reasons. We review for plain error, see United States v. Vega, 545 F.3d 743, 747 (9th Cir. 2008), and find none. The reasons for imposing the challenged condition, including rehabilitation and prevention of recidivism, are apparent from the record. See id. at 748-49 & n. 5; United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc) (adequate explanation may be inferred from the PSR or the record as a whole).

AFFIRMED.