Keith Judd v. Barack Obama
Keith Judd v. Barack Obama
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Appellants appeal from the district court’s order striking their complaint and terminating their action alleging fraud in the 2012 presidential election. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995) (per curiam). We affirm.
After careful examination of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. We reject as merit-less appellants’ contentions of judicial bias *593 and that the district court’s dismissal violated their constitutional rights.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.