U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Michael Bunton

United States v. Michael Bunton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 1, 2014 · Fletcher, Rawlinson, Christen
584 F. App'x 864

United States v. Michael Bunton

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Michael Bunton appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Bunion’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Bunton the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.