United States v. Dagoberto Cervantes-Portillo

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Dagoberto Cervantes-Portillo, 585 F. App'x 341 (9th Cir. 2014)

United States v. Dagoberto Cervantes-Portillo

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Dagoberto Cervantes-Portillo appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Cervantes-Portillo’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Cervantes-Portillo the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

***

-phis disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dagoberto CERVANTES-PORTILLO, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished