MEMORANDUM *

The BIA didn’t err in denying Reyes’s application for protection under the Convention Against Torture. Nothing in the record or the BIA’s decision indicates a failure to consider all the evidence. See Cole v. Holder, 659 F.3d 762, 771 (9th Cir. 2011). Indeed, the BIA explicitly considered much of the evidence Reyes provided, including the 2010 Country Report and the 2007 Harvard article, and it wasn’t required to “expressly refute on the record every single piece of evidence.” Feng Gui Lin v. Holder, 588 F.3d 981, 987 (9th Cir. 2009). It then reasonably concluded that although “the situation for persons with gang related tattoos in El Salvador may well be highly dangerous,” it is not “more likely than not at this time that [Reyes] will be tortured upon return to El Salvador.” See Alphonsus v. Holder, 705 F.3d 1031, 1049-50 (9th Cir. 2013); Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1049 (9th Cir. 2010). In light of this conclusion and in context, the typographical error Reyes points out doesn’t require a remand.

DENIED.