United States v. Sergio Pantoja-Torres

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Sergio Pantoja-Torres

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 16 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-10202

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:13-cr-01519-JGZ v.

MEMORANDUM* SERGIO ELOY PANTOJA-TORRES, a.k.a. Sergio Eloy Pantoja,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 9, 2014** Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Sergio Eloy Pantoja-Torres appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 18-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S. 738 (1967), Pantoja-Torres’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Pantoja-Torres the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 14-10202

Reference

Status
Unpublished