United States v. David Shumilo
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
David Shumilo appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 131-month sentence for a racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Shumilo’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Shumilo the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Shumilo has waived his right to appeal his conviction and 131-month sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David SHUMILO, A.K.A. Russian Boy, Defendant-Appellant
- Status
- Unpublished