Steshenko v. Mckay

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit January 17, 2014

Steshenko v. Mckay, 552 F. App'x 721 (9th Cir. 2014)

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiff Gregory Steshenko appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

The sole issue is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. We conclude *722the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24, 129 S.Ct. 365, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name: Gregory STESHENKO v. Thomas McKAY, of the Cabrillo Community College
Status: Published