Diaz v. Arizona
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Joseph Diaz and Luis Campas brought a 20-count, 51-page complaint against a dozen defendants. Diaz and Campas claim that one defendant wrote them a bad check, and that when they tried to have that defendant prosecuted, the other defendants retaliated against them by, among other things, taking away their boxing licenses. (Diaz is a trainer and Cam-pas a boxer.) The district court granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Campas and Diaz appeal. Jurisdiction lies under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1072 (9th Cir. 2005), and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Cir. R. 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Joseph Anthony DIAZ Luis Ramon Campas v. State of ARIZONA, a separate entity and in its capacity as the Arizona State Boxing Commission Janet A. Napolitano, in her capacity as ex-Governor Earl Vance Wilcox, in his individual and representative capacity as Ex-Special Assistant to the Governor Mary Rose Wilcox, in her individual and representative capacity as exmember of the Arizona State Boxing Commission and as Supervisor of District 5, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors John Montano, in his individual and representative capacity as the Ex-Executive Director and/or Assistant Director of the Arizona State Boxing Commission or Boxing Director County of Maricopa, a municipal entity and in its capacity as the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Richard M. Romley, an ex-Acting Maricopa County Attorney Peter McKinn, III, an individual and as an employee of Top Rank Incorporated Top Rank Incorporated, a corporation, as a separate entity Gabriel Esqueda, an individual and as an employee of Top Rank and/or Peter McKinn III Bruce Trampler, an employee of Top Rank Bob Arum, an employee of Top Rank
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published