Smith v. California

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit November 20, 2014

Smith v. California, 585 F. App'x 650 (9th Cir. 2014)

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

In light of the Defendants’ concession that they were not “prevailing parties]” *651within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) and that the award of costs should be reversed, we reverse the award of costs.

REVERSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name: Robert P. SMITH, III v. State of CALIFORNIA, and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and A. Hedgpeth
Status: Published